The Tree of Wellbeing

---

The Tree of Well-being is grounded in two lines of peer-reviewed research: a robust model of human flourishing that has been validated worldwide, and a body of evidence on how adults actually learn and retain new concepts.

Ryff's Six-Factor Model of Psychological Wellbeing

In 1989, psychologist Carol Ryff challenged the prevailing view that well-being simply meant "feeling happy." Drawing from developmental psychology (Erikson's psychosocial stages), humanistic theories of personal growth (Maslow, Rogers, Allport), and philosophical traditions dating to Aristotle's concept of eudaimonia, Ryff proposed that human flourishing rests on six interrelated dimensions: self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth (Ryff, 1989).

This was a significant departure. Before Ryff, wellbeing research focused almost exclusively on hedonic measures: happiness, positive affect, and life satisfaction. These constructs, while important, failed to capture the full breadth of what it means to live well. Ryff's eudaimonic framework added four dimensions that had never appeared in previous well-being measures: positive relations, autonomy, purpose, and growth (Ryff, 1989; Ryff, 2014).

The model's factor structure was confirmed in a nationally representative U.S. sample (Ryff & Keyes, 1995) and has since been validated across diverse populations and cultures. Studies in Japan (Sasaki et al., 2020), Spain (van Dierendonck et al., 2008), and the United Kingdom (Abbott et al., 2006) have confirmed that the six dimensions represent distinct yet interrelated facets of psychological wellbeing. An international study spanning over 100 countries found strong convergence between eudaimonic and hedonic measures while confirming their conceptual distinctiveness (Disabato et al., 2016). Ryff's own 2014 review documented extensive replications of the six-factor structure and growing evidence linking these dimensions to measurable biological outcomes, including lower salivary cortisol, decreased cardiovascular risk, and improved sleep (Ryff, 2014).

For healthcare professionals, this model is especially relevant. When productivity pressures strip clinicians of autonomy, when rushed care undermines their sense of competence, and when isolation damages their relational connections, well-being collapses across multiple dimensions simultaneously. The CORE Framework uses Ryff's model as the foundation for understanding burnout not as individual weakness but as dysfunction in the system of wellbeing itself, consistent with Deming's principle that every system is perfectly designed to produce the results it gets.

Embodied and Experiential Learning

The Tree of Wellbeing is not a lecture. It is an experiential exercise, and that design choice is intentional.

Kolb's experiential learning theory holds that meaningful learning occurs through a cycle of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation (Kolb, 2015). Adults do not learn systems thinking by hearing about systems thinking. They learn it by experiencing a system, seeing its patterns, and reflecting on what they notice.

The Tree of Wellbeing engages this cycle directly. Participants experience the abstract concept of "wellbeing as a system" by rating six dimensions and watching a living tree respond to their scores. Low scores create visible thinning or bareness. High scores produce fullness. The shape that emerges is not a chart or a number; it is a spatial, visual, intuitive representation that engages multiple neural pathways beyond verbal processing alone. This approach aligns with evidence that somatic and embodied learning strategies improve adult retention by recruiting kinesthetic and spatial processing alongside cognitive understanding (Kolb, 2015).

When participants see their tree with shallow roots or a bare canopy, the insight is immediate and personal. They do not need to be told that their system is under-resourced. They can see it. That shift from abstract concept to felt understanding is what makes experiential design more powerful than lecture for adult learners, particularly for topics as personal as burnout and wellbeing.

References

Abbott, R. A., Ploubidis, G. B., Huppert, F. A., Kuh, D., Wadsworth, M. E. J., & Croudace, T. J. (2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff's psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-76

Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2016). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000209

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.

Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in science and practice. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727.

Sasaki, N., Watanabe, K., Imamura, K., Nishi, D., Karasawa, M., Kan, C., Ryff, C. D., & Kawakami, N. (2020). Japanese version of the 42-item psychological well-being scale (PWBS-42): A validation study. BMC Psychology, 8(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00441-1

van Dierendonck, D., Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., & Moreno-Jiménez, B. (2008). Ryff's six-factor model of psychological well-being: A Spanish exploration. Social Indicators Research, 87, 473-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9174-7